Wednesday, September 3, 2014

PhD Completion: What it Takes to be the Gardener of Your Own Success

gardeningby E. Alana James, Doctoral Net: http://info.doctoralnet.com/professors-ambassadors-blog/phd-completion-what-it-takes-to-be-the-gardener-of-your-own-success

Before I start - be sure to sign up to receive all the news about the Open House which will run Sept. 5th-22nd. DoctoralNet is rolling out great fun and excellent content to help doctoral students around the world do well this year.  

The fall, or autumn, is a good time to think about what we were able to build so far this year. I've been ruminating about growing plants and the gardener's relationship to PhD candidates, entrepreneurs or anyone else who is actively building their dreams.

This post teases out both the strength and humility needed by all of us and the relationship of various attributes as we build anything new, especially the dream of becoming a Doctor. 

I hope that by investigating the many small qualities which, when taken together make up the Habits of Mind and the skill set used by a good gardener, we can hold ourselves to our own high expectations and continue to onward to success.

Before We Start

It's important to make note of the fact that these are habits of mind, and skills, therefore built over time.We all have a fantasy about where we want to go, but beginners can take on a false perspective about what is achievable and then become discouraged if they don't meet that image. 

New terrain is exciting, but when we don't live up to our initial view of how things ought to be, we can experience shame or anxiety. We can change that by maintaining a personal outlook that all of these ideas develop slowly and steadily, rather than all at once.

As a doctoral student, it is also important to remember that positive outcomes of great adventures or dreams change a person.

You will not be the same person when you finish your PhD as when you started because in between were a lot of challenges, places where you could have chosen to give up on yourself but instead you kept going, etc. Each one of these is like the cold water into which the hot steel is dipped when it is being tempered.

Your Mindset

It is important not to forget what matters most, our humanity. We need to love the work, the process of growing and putting the new pieces together. Building a dream needs to involve our creativity. That's important because trial and error is always involved in “getting it right.” 

If we love the work, if it involves our creativity then we have a natural desire to nurture that growth and to maintain the vision. These five words: love, creativity, desire, growth, vision must be at the heart of our personal view of the work we undertake.

But drive alone won't help us through the rough spots. For that we need the strength of determination, focus and an ability to weed out the undesirable in ourselves, and in the outcomes we may achieve along the way. For academic writers, this means we need to have the fortitude to keep revising our work until it is solid and defensible.

A sense of purpose about the work as a whole will allow us to hear strong judgments from others about what is less than completely desirable in our work.  It's also nice to be able to listen with a sense of humor. None of us complete a task right the first time and for that reason we cannot take ourselves or our work too seriously.

Drive, determination, sense of purpose, and having a sense of humor all rolled together with kindness towards yourself can be the greatest gift of all: the ability to forgive your own mistakes and those of others. We sail through the process of building a dream when we can do it with an open heart.

What Habits Will Support You?

It takes experience to be able to make work fun. We only enjoy the process after we have repeatedly gone through it enough to understand the inherent ups and downs in the process. This requires that we approach our work with consistency and persistence. Getting up every day and doing a little gets us closer and closer to getting it done.

We need to persevere in the face of all kinds of challenges or distractions which might get in the way. The trap here is in doggedly trying to keep going even when experiencing the pain that comes if circumstances don't go our way. There will be challenges that can stop us in our tracks for awhile. 

In order to keep going we need to be able to fail, and we cannot hold ourselves to a standard of perfectionism.

Developing a strong work ethic was probably one of the best things I ever did for myself and my ability to build my dreams and makes them come true. 

Each step along the way requires that I focus, observe what I like and don't like about any current state, and adapt as required to manually build the outcomes I'm after.  Tools like backward mapping and time management aid that work ethic and create success.

Conclusion

The ability to grow plants and harvest dreams whether from the marketplace, university, or garden, requires that we allow the work to change and grow and to love what manifests as we progress, keep sight of our purpose, and maintain our humanity. Taking stock about how we feel about where we are is always a good first step. 

This is written in the hopes it helps a person or two set their own internal standards a little higher. People who aim for the top often achieve it. People who don't consider what it takes, seldom do.

Should we Patch the Leaky PhD Pipeline?

Simon Hazelwood-Smith
Image courtesy of Simon Hazelwood-Smith
by Julie Gould, Nature Jobs: http://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2014/09/02/should-we-patch-the-leaky-pipeline

Introducing Simon Hazelwood-Smith, one of the winners of the London Naturejobs Career Expo journalism competition

Simon is an MSc student studying science and technology policy at the University of Sussex. 

He has a background in genetics, having previously worked as a research assistant in the Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at King’s College London. Outside of work he likes to keep active and enjoys rock climbing, playing football, cycling and skiing. 
—-x—-
What would it mean for there to be too many PhDs? An obvious answer might be when the number of PhD studentships far outweigh postdoctoral positions. This is indeed where the current ratio lies (need to register with Vitae to read).

However in my view this answer is inadequate; does it mean that there are too many PhDs, or too few postdocs? And is there inherently a problem with some students electing, or even being pushed, to leave academia and pursue other careers?

Science has for some time had a brutally pyramidal shaped career path with some comparing it, perhaps a little harshly, to a Ponzi scheme. For scientists, the reality of short contracts, relatively low pay and highly competitive progression into more senior positions is, in general, well acknowledged.

In truth the idea that there is an issue only at PhD level is short sighted; scientists leave in high numbers at each stage of the possible academic career.

Many efforts have been made to stem the ‘leaky pipeline’ from PhD to Principal Investigator. But for those who believe in the scientific method, could it not be seen as a positive thing, that former researchers are entering other sectors?

Evidence-based decision-making as a way of forming policies is becoming more and more popular in both governments and industries. A workforce that contains employees with formal scientific training is, to me, no bad thing.

It is often said that a PhD programme is an apprenticeship into the world of academia. However with around 50% of students leaving science following the end of their PhD, it is no longer sufficient to only train for a life of research. The opportunity to learn transferable skills should be provided by universities to all students.

For those who stay in academia, it is pertinent for them to be aware of the political and social impacts of their work and to be prepared for interactions with the media and the public. For those that leave, the transition to other roles should be eased by these complementary skills.

Direct comparison between PhDs can be problematic, especially given the fact that PhD studentships are not a homogenous group. Even within the life sciences in the UK, in which I currently work, there is great disparity in the requirements of each programme. Stipends, introductory years, time to upgrade (from Mphil to PhD), taught aspects, and more all vary massively.

If we truly want to understand these issues we must record comprehensive information on career destinations, including different sorts of PhD. Qualitative data on the reasons for leaving (or staying!) and how many students are willingly switching careers are particularly useful for those choosing future pathways, and should also influence the design of any changes to the PhD systems.

An attitude shift is needed by both students and their mentors towards a more honest perspective on the career prospects of PhDs.

This may be challenging, especially as PI’s are those select few scientists that avoided the ‘leak’, and so may not always be receptive to mandatory teaching outside of the fundamental research of the studentship. However, to not acknowledge the fact that a student may leave academia seems potentially damaging.

I myself, currently a research assistant in a genetics laboratory, have decided against a PhD to pursue a career in science policy. Nevertheless I have a great respect for PhD students, and there is certainly much value to be gained from them, not least in the research itself.

However for those embarking on PhDs, whatever their ambitions, pushing to learn transferable skills seems the most pragmatic way of ensuring employment following the end of the project, whether you stay in the world of academia or not.

Find out more about the conference delegates, exhibitors and workshop sessions at the Naturejobs Career Expo in London here, and you can follow the action on Twitter using the #NJCE14 hashtag.