The ‘STEM One Year On’ report (Photo credit: Northern Ireland Executive) |
Higher education is often seen as an export industry in the developed world, but the economic crisis has exposed once again its role as a driver for economic growth.
Investment in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines is increasingly seen in the US and Europe as a means to boost innovation, particularly in manufacturing, the sector which helped Asian economies grow exponentially over the last two decades.
A debate on the importance of science education is brewing on both sides of the Atlantic but gets particularly heated when it intersects with immigration.
A 'STEM cliff' in the US
In no other country is this debate fiercer than the US.
Currently, all foreign graduates are eligible to stay in the country for
29 months after they graduate. Most of them do so. According to a 2012 report
by the National Science Board, two-thirds of the international students
who received a PhD in a science subject in 2004 were still in the
country in 2009.
Imported talent is necessary to meet increasing demand for STEM skills. According to a report
by the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation in 2010, the
number of STEM graduates will have to increase by 20-30% by 2016 to meet
the projected growth of the US economy.
Overall, STEM employment grew
three times more than non-STEM employment over the last twelve years,
and is expected to grow twice as fast by 2018.
The political establishment and the business community
have acknowledged the need to import international talent. In a rare
moment of bipartisan agreement, the House of Representatives passed the STEM Jobs Act 2012 in November.
It was later blocked by the Senate, but is expected to be reintroduced
in amended form in 2013. This piece of legislation will make 55,000
visas available to immigrants who hold PhDs and Master's degrees in STEM
fields from US universities, thereby exempting them from immigration
quotas.
Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney supported the Act
during their campaigns, recognising that foreign STEM students are
job-creators. A recent University of California-Berkeley and Duke
University study
found that 25% of engineering and tech companies set up in the US
between 1995 and 2005 had at least one foreign-born founder.
The
benefits to US workers are obvious. According to a 2011 report
by the American Enterprise Institute and the Partnership for a New
American Economy, every foreign-born worker with a STEM degree creates
an average 2.6 extra jobs for native-born workers.
These numbers do not convince the anti-immigration
lobby, which claims that the import of skilled labour suppresses wages,
thereby disincentivising STEM graduates from seeking careers in these
fields. It also encourages high school students to apply for degrees in
other subjects, such as law and business.
More than anything else,
anti-immigration groups claim that foreign STEM graduates returning to
their home countries steal from America the valuable skills that are
necessary in the global race for innovation.
To read further, go to: http://www.obhe.ac.uk/newsletters/borderless_report_january_2013/global_race_for_stem_skills
No comments:
Post a Comment