| Cognitive domain of Bloom's Taxonomy (Wikipedia) | 
This puts instructional strategies, literacy strategies, curriculum mapping, standards unpacking, assessment design, digital literacy, and a dozen other facets of education beneath its umbrella.
With that in mind, we’ve created the following 32 characteristics of higher-level instructional planning to help you spot the holes in your teaching.
Technology Integration
- Technology connects students with authentic content and communities
 - Personalized learning experiences are achieved through a variety of mobile, game-based, or self-directed learning
 - Technology creates learning opportunities impossible without it
 - Technology is a means, not an end
 
- Rigor is omnipresent, from bell ringers and quizzes to accountable talk and assessments
 - Students generate original ideas from seemingly disparate sources of information
 - Students consistently revisit ideas, thinking and general misconceptions (e.g., via digital portfolio)
 - Thinking habits are valued over demonstrated “proficiency”
 
- Lesson planning templates serve student thinking, not district “non-negotiables”
 - Bloom’s taxonomy (or related learning taxonomies) is/are used to move students from basic to complex thinking daily
 - Data is applied immediately and meaningfully to revise planned instruction
 - There is clear evidence of backwards design
 
- Transfer is required to prove mastery
 - Data is easily extracted and visualized
 - The academic standard and assessment form complement one another
 - There is opportunity for students to demonstrate what they do know rather than simply succeed or fail in demonstrating what the assessment asks for
 
- Curriculum naturally absorbs and adapts to data sources
 - Curriculum map is dynamic, changing in response to data and circumstance
 - There is clear priority of academic standards (not all standards are created equal)
 - There is clear evidence of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model
 
- Student questioning–rather than the teacher’s–drives learning
 - The ability for self-directed learning extends beyond the topical, to assessment forms, research sources, learning technology, topics, and essential questions
 - Learning pathways can be self-directed by ambitious, supported, and/or resourceful students
 - Students recognize and can articulate their own role in the learning process at any given time
 
- Expectations are clear
 - Discipline is a collective effort: peers, colleagues, administration, and family
 - Fair doesn’t always mean equal
 - “Behavior” starts with self-awareness and self-respect, which must be encouraged and modeled
 
- Students have choice in demonstrating understanding
 - There are exemplar models immediately accessible to students of all important work and activities
 - Students are accountable to peers, families, organizations, and communities, not you
 - Student literacy levels are meaningfully taken into account when planning instruction
 
No comments:
Post a Comment