by
Daniel Little, Understanding Society: http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com.au/2014/12/a-more-inclusive-university.html
The challenge of creating a truly inclusive university is a difficult
one.
Inclusiveness is more than diversity. It is an institution and
culture in which people from all social groups - race, nationality,
gender, sexuality, religion, ethnicity - are fully embraced and
respected.
It is an environment in which every individual is afforded
the opportunity and space to do his or her best work, unimpeded by
stereotype or discriminatory arrangements.
But achieving this harmonious
and democratic outcome is challenging, for a variety of reasons.
Most
important among these is the difficulty of overcoming limitations of
perspective from the various groups, including especially the majority
group. Practices that seem innocuous and neutral to majority group
members are often experienced as demeaning and limiting by non-majority
group members - what some students now refer to as “micro-aggressions”.
The inter-university consortium know as the Future of Minority Studies
continues to do good work in attempting to make progress on improving
the inclusiveness of universities, and the most recent contribution to
its publication series is particularly salient.
This is The Truly Diverse Faculty: New Dialogues in American Higher Education,
a collection of essays by highly talented young faculty of color who
write honestly about their experiences at a range of universities around
the United States.
Edited by Stephanie Fryberg and Ernesto Javier
Martinez, the volume goes beyond the rhetoric of diversity that is
present at most American universities to probe honestly the challenges
that exist for faculty of color.
The volume contains primary articles
from talented younger scholars like Victoria Plaut, Denise Sekaquaptewa,
and Tiffany Willoughby-Herard, as well as comments by more senior
scholars such as Chandra Mohanty, Nancy Cantor, and Michael
Hames-Garcia.
A central challenge for the goal of a truly
inclusive and democratic university is the patterns of race and
privilege that are built into our institutions through their history.
Most universities in the United States are overwhelmingly “white” -
their faculty and their cultures have been constructed through a history
that made it difficult to impossible to genuinely incorporate racial
diversity. And this appears to be more true the further one ascends into
the ranks of the elite research universities.
These observations are
less true of several segments of American higher education: the
historically black universities and colleges, the non-flagship public
universities, and the community colleges in many parts of the country.
But for the elite colleges and universities in the US, the demography,
history, and culture all tip sharply towards what Phillip Goff calls
“Whiteness” in his contribution to the volume (one could say much the
same about the gender composition and culture of many universities and
departments).
This fact presents a major challenge to people who
want to see universities change fundamentally with regard to race and
culture. We want the twenty-first century university to be genuinely
multi-racial, multi-cultural, multi-religious, and multi-ethnic.
We want
these “multi’s” because our country itself is multicultural, and
because we have a national history that has not done a good job of
creating an environment of equality and democracy across racial and
cultural lines.
And we want the universities to change, because they are
key locations where the values and skills of our future leaders will be
formed. So if universities do not succeed in transforming themselves
around the realities of race and difference, we cannot expect the larger
society to succeed in this difficult challenge either.
This
means that university faculty and administrators need a much better
understanding of the scope of the problem. Why is it that the current
American university is often such a negative environment for many
faculty of color - especially junior faculty?
What concrete and
practical steps can we take to get from where we are to where we want to
be - from an environment defined by majority values, culture, and
power, to one that is genuinely and democratically framed by the
multi-cultural reality of our society?
How can we make the transition
that is required that will lead us to the university of the future, in
which our department meetings, our tenure processes, and our
university-wide intellectual communities are genuinely respectful of
racial, ethnic, and gender differences?
The essays in this
volume are a valuable contribution to making the university better. One
thing that we have learned through a body of multicultural research
over the past several decades, is how important it is to get past
“perspective blindness.”
When majority faculty members or
administrators think about race in the university, they generally have
only a very limited understanding of the concrete situations that
faculty and students of color face. So the concrete specificity of the
articles in this volume provides a valuable learning opportunity for the
majority members of any university.
There is valuable pedagogical work
going on in many universities that is designed to make more apparent the
hidden biases and practices that are still too common.
For example, the
Center for Research on Learning and Teaching at the University of
Michigan has developed many tools for highlighting the situations of
race and gender that can arise in the classroom that majority faculty
members are simply unlikely to see without some help (link).
This volume is enormously valuable in this respect as well. Reading
the collection helps department chairs, deans, and presidents have a
better idea, in concrete terms, of what it means to recognize that
faculty of color face an environment that imposes greater burdens and
greater stresses, and that these burdens and stresses make their
research and teaching agendas all the more difficult to achieve.
So the
university needs to arrive at concrete strategies for counteracting
these negative effects.
(FYI - some of this post is adapted from
my own short contribution to the volume in my comments on Phillip
Goff's excellent piece).
No comments:
Post a Comment