by Stewart Hase, Heutagogy of Community Practice, Teach Thought: http://www.teachthought.com/learning/a-learning-typology-7-ways-we-come-to-understand/
This typology is an attempt to redefine how we think of learning in the 21st
century context.
Current definitions of learning focus on performance
rather than holistic growth, and on what the learner can do after a
learning experience. Gagne is perhaps the most notable exception.
General dictionary definitions of learning refer to learning as the acquisition of knowledge. (Also, see TeachThought’s 21st Century Learning Dictionary). The
prevailing psychological definition is that learning is a change in
behavior resulting from experience. Both these definitions seem
inadequate given recent advances in neuroscience that shows us how
complex a process is learning.
We are much more able now to examine directly how people learn rather
than indirectly by studying what techniques work, which tends to be
anecdotal and qualitative. It seems now to make more sense to design
learning experiences around how learning takes place and blends with
learner interest rather than to produce a particular outcome.
The typology described below concerns what is happening in the mind
of the learner during the experience of learning. Using this as a base
we are able to then jump into outcomes and the educational or learning
experience itself.
Each type of learning implies that different learning experiences can
be designed to either help people learn or are aimed at people already
operating at that level.
The worthiness test is not meant to be applied. This is a typology
not a taxonomy. For example, conditioned behaviors, habits and
competencies are critical to survival and to the efficient use of
resources. They don’t need to be seen as less vital or subservient to
say adaptive learning, although they could perhaps be said to be more
primitive.
A Learning Typology: 7 Ways We Come To Understand
1. Autopoietic and Adaptive
This involves what one could call deep learning. Complex connections
are made between previous learning in the face of the need to adapt.
Bifurcation enables shifts in perspective, the confident ability to
attempt something new, to experiment.
Autopoiesis involves self-organization and adaptive behavior in
highly complex and perhaps chaotic environment. Learning is applied in
novel ways, reflexivity, double loop learning and triple loop learning
are used as normal practice to evaluate behavior and outcomes that then
facilitate more change in a continuous, adaptive, feedback loop.
Knowledge becomes wisdom.
All learning involves pathways being established in the brain that
are then retrieved in the form of memory. In adaptive learning, however,
we see connections being made between different pathways that create
new insights, new ways of seeing the world, new hypotheses to be tested.
This is the world of creativity and innovation, and, ultimately,
survival in the face of the need to adapt.
You can imagine this sort of learning occurring in the face of very
complex problems or when survival is threatened. We are forced to look
at the world in a different way, to challenge existing dogmas that
clearly are not working.
Thus, motivation is high either by design or by
rising stress. In the case of the former, one thinks of Edison’s
laboratory in Menlo Park or perhaps Google and Apple, hot houses of
innovation and creativity.
The latter may involve a more spontaneous rethinking of a theory, a
new way of interpreting our experience (data or events), a new insight
into a phenomenon, perhaps a reinventing of self.
2. Shifts in Cognitive Schema
Cognitive schema are our values, attitudes and beliefs, that are
transcribed into thoughts and actions. In normal day-to-day life they
are relatively resistant to change. They are learned early in life and
drive much of our behavior. With strong links to the emotional parts of
our brains cognitive schema will often override even very convincing
evidence to the contrary.
So, a shift in our cognitive schema is a very high order learning
experience. It often takes a very emotionally charged event, a powerful
experience to change them. This was something that constructivism and
one of its sequela, experiential learning, understood very well, as does
much of psychotherapy.
As in adaptive learning, a new complex web of pathways is developed,
and the old are broken down. So powerful is this shift from old to new
that we may later never even recall having held a particular belief or
attitude.
With a shift in cognitive schema comes a new set of behaviors. I may,
for example, be involved in a cleverly designed experiential learning
activity in a workshop that causes me to become aware that I have some
very controlling behaviours as a leader. The insight is so powerful that
I decide to combat this strong personality trait, delegate more and to
trust others rather than micro-manage them.
3. Capability Development
Capable people (Cairns, Stephenson) are able to apply learning in
novel situations as well as the familiar. They also have a high level of
self-efficacy, collaborate well with others and have the capacity to
learn.
Here context is the key to new learning. Changing context provides an
opportunity to experiment with our competencies and perhaps find novel
and authentic ways of problem finding and solving.
To develop capability I am required to apply my competencies in a
range of novel situations, to stay calm in the face of complexity, to
think analytically about how to use my skills, to learn new skills, and
to seek out a mentor or learn vicariously.
I am aware of the importance
of relational learning, and of the potential of the learning commons. As
I become more adept my self-efficacy increases and becomes more
generalized.
4. Tacit Learning
High-level competencies are internalized so effectively that highly
skilled tasks can be undertaken without observable/overt thought.
Thoughts may be actualized through external questioning. Tacit learning
is mostly seen in expert practitioners and occurs quite unconsciously.
I am placed in situations where my competencies are refined in the face of increasingly complex tasks.
5. Competence
Competencies consist of knowledge and skills. We acquire these
through direct experience or vicariously, informally and in formal
education. Most formal education is concerned with competence attainment
and its reproduction.
In today’s networked world obtaining competencies is easier than ever
before. We acquire competence through formal education experiences or,
more likely, through informal process, when and if we require them.
6. Operant Conditioning
Unconscious, conditioned responses to stimuli in the environment, is
also known as operant conditioning. This is a very common form of
learning in formal and informal settings and is responsible for us
learning many physical and social life skills essential for survival.
We perform a behavior and we are rewarded for it by some form of
recognition, reward or positive outcome. The reward conditions the
response and we are more likely to reproduce the behaviour in the
future. The conditioning of more complex behaviors become habits and are
unconsciously repeated.
This sort of learning (conditioning) can also be vicarious as we
watch others experience positive outcomes when they do something.
7. Signal Learning
The simplest form of learning also known as classical conditioning.
Again, this is a very common form of learning and is unconscious.
When I was a child my mother once gave me honey on bread when I was
very sick with Scarlet Fever. It made me feel nauseous. Since then I
have had a mild aversion to honey and never eat it. This was an
unintended response (nausea) to the stimulus (honey).
Advertisers use classical conditioning techniques to make us buy
things. An attractive person driving a particular car or using an
appliance is used as a stimulus to elicit a response. A close friend who
you always have a great time with when you go out wears a particular
perfume. The smell of the perfume on other people makes you feel really
good-without you being aware of it.
A Learning Typology: 7 Ways We Come To Understand; image attribution stewarthase and nasagoddard
No comments:
Post a Comment