In Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie and Rebecca Frels offer
a new guide on how to produce a comprehensive literature review through
seven key steps that incorporate rigour, validity and reliability.
Ana Raquel Nunes
recommends this helpful, well-informed and well-organised book to those
undertaking literature reviews as well as those reflecting on research
methodologies more broadly.
This review originally appeared on LSE Review of Books.
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach,
by Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie and Rebecca Frels, offers a straightforward
guide on how to conduct literature reviews, and is the successor to
Onwuegbuzie’s numerous previous works on qualitative, quantitative and
mixed methods research.
The book is a source of in-depth understanding
of the role that literature reviews play within the research process and
its practices, and is a substantive contribution to social, behavioural
and health sciences research. It aims at incorporating rigour, validity
and reliability when conducting literature reviews and presents seven
steps on how to achieve this.
According to the authors, literature reviews should be systematic,
defined ‘as a set of rigorous routines, documentation of such routines,
and the way the literature reviewer negotiates particular biases
throughout these routines’ (10). The authors acknowledge that this
definition differs from the definitions of systematic literature reviews
used in the health sciences.
Instead, this book defines a comprehensive
literature review (CLR) as an integrative review, being the combination
of narrative review (i.e. theoretical, historical, general and
methodological reviews) and systematic review (i.e. meta-analysis,
meta-summary, rapid review and meta-synthesis).
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review
purposefully addresses CLR as ‘a methodological, culturally progressive
approach involving the practice of documenting the process of inquiry
into the current state of knowledge about a selected topic’ (18).
Additionally, the authors’ approach to the CLR takes into account the
researcher’s philosophical stance, research methods and practices which,
when combined, create a framework for collecting, analysing and
evaluating the information that will form the basis for conducting a
literature review.
The book thus presents five types of information -
MODES: namely, Media; Observation(s); Documents; Experts(s); and
Secondary Sources - that help the researcher in their journey through
the literature review landscape, which in the end will produce either a
separate output or inform primary research within a bigger research
project.
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review is an effective tool for an iterative process denoting a structured and chronological approach to conducting literature reviews. The book covers a range of research topics and practical examples arising from the authors’ own research including education, counselling and health systems research. Through these, the authors report an in-depth model characterised by a series of qualitative, quantitative and mixed research approaches, methods and techniques used to collect, analyse and evaluate data/information for the creation of new knowledge.
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review is an effective tool for an iterative process denoting a structured and chronological approach to conducting literature reviews. The book covers a range of research topics and practical examples arising from the authors’ own research including education, counselling and health systems research. Through these, the authors report an in-depth model characterised by a series of qualitative, quantitative and mixed research approaches, methods and techniques used to collect, analyse and evaluate data/information for the creation of new knowledge.
As its title suggests, the book is
organised around seven sequential steps within three phases: the
Exploration Phase includes Steps 1-5 (Exploring Beliefs and Topics;
Initiating the Search; Storing and Organising Information;
Selecting/Deselecting Information; and Expanding the Search (MODES));
the Interpretation Phase includes Step 6 (Analysing and Synthesising
Information); and the Communication Phase includes Step 7 (Presenting
the CLR Report).
As the argument of the book develops, the differences
between traditional literature reviews and the CLR become evident as the
seven steps are unveiled. Traditional literature reviews are
encapsulated within Steps 1-4, whilst a CLR goes further through the
addition of Steps 5-7.
One of the steps that was of particular
interest to me was Step 6 on analysing and synthesising information. The
book advances research methodology knowledge and practice on the
different elements of empirical data and how both qualitative and
quantitative information can be analysed and synthesised to inform a
CLR.
In Step 6, the authors go to great lengths to explain and exemplify
how users can perform qualitative and quantitative data analyses of
information, as well as the level of integration that can be achieved
when doing mixed methods analyses.
Additionally, the authors explore the
nature of data analysis and identify three levels or layers that need
to be taken into consideration: namely, the research approach (e.g.
grounded theory); the research method (e.g. measures if regression); and
the research technique (e.g. content analysis) used. This is found to
be essential as data analysis is considered to be a product of the
research method used, which in turn is linked to the research approach.
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review
is not merely intended for those conducting a literature review, but it
also works as a research methodology book as it addresses an extensive
number of research methodologies, methods and techniques. The book
offers a theoretically and practically informed discussion of increased
integration of research processes, practices and products, raising
important quality standards assurances necessary for a CLR, but also for
research more generally.
This is a very well-organised book which
cleverly and effectively uses tables, figures and boxes throughout to
illustrate and help contextualise detailed examples of the different
steps involved in conducting a literature review.
Accordingly, readers seeking a tool or a
guide on conducting literature reviews will find this a very helpful
book. It will also be of use to a broader readership interested in
research methodology more generally as it encompasses the different
research traditions (qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods) as
well as the stages of the research process (the research problem, the
literature review, research design, data collection, data analysis and
interpretation and report writing).
For the reasons above, it will
appeal widely to students, academics and practitioners interested in
conducting literature reviews within the social, behavioural and health
sciences. It is suitable for different levels of experience in
conducting literature reviews and doing research in general.
Furthermore, this is a book that should be at-hand and used as a guide
each time one decides to conduct a piece of research that includes a
literature review as it will provide new ideas and directions depending
on the topic and disciplinary perspective.
Dr Ana Raquel Nunes is a
Research Fellow in the Division of Health Sciences at the Warwick
Medical School, University of Warwick, and a Research Methodologist and
Adviser for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research
Design Service (RDS). She is an interdisciplinary and mixed methods
researcher working at the interface between public health, environmental
science and social science. Her active interests include human
vulnerability, resilience and adaptation to stresses and threats (e.g.
climate change), housing and health, and fuel poverty. You can find more
about her research here.
Note: This review gives the views of
the author, and not the position of the LSE Review of Books blog, or of
the London School of Economics.
No comments:
Post a Comment